The Closing Window: How Governments Could Lose Their Ability to Restrain Advanced AI
arXiv:2608.05173v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As AI capabilities advance, AI systems will pose greater risks to national security and potentially humanity as a whole. Governments may eventually conclude that these risks warrant restraining AI development. This motivates the question: will governments still be able to restrain AI development in the future, should they want to do so? In this paper we analyze which world events and changes to the state of AI development would make future governan
Record details
Published: 7 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Military & security
Retrieved: 7 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
The Nuclear Decision-Making Benchmark: Evaluating Frontier LLMs on Nuclear Tendencies
arXiv cs.CY · 7 August 2026
FedVAR: Prototype-Aligned Federated Framework for Video Anomaly Recognition
arXiv · 7 August 2026
TRACE: A Multi-Layer Benchmark for Human AI Controller Coordination Under Drift and Failure
arXiv · 7 August 2026
Improving Interoperability among Defence and National Security Ontologies: Analysis and Evaluation Tasks
arXiv · 6 August 2026
The Anatomy of a Prompt Injection: A Component Model for Structured Analysis
arXiv red teaming query · 7 August 2026
Toward Resilient Human-AI Collaboration: A Lifecycle Taxonomy of Sociotechnical Risks and Cascading Failures
arXiv cs.HC · 6 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (7 August 2026), “The Closing Window: How Governments Could Lose Their Ability to Restrain Advanced AI,” evidence record 17000, https://ethics.ai/record/17000 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.