Evidence record 16728 · automatically gathered

Comparing Video-Based and Face-to-Face Psychotherapy: Systematic Review and Multilevel Meta-Analysis Across Mental Disorders

Background: Video-based psychotherapy (VBT) is increasingly used to expand access to mental health care. Review studies generally report symptom outcomes similar to those achieved with face-to-face (F2F) psychotherapy. However, these studies often analyze VBT alongside other remote modalities, and it remains unclear what portion of the effects can be attributed to the video-based setting itself. Objective: The objective of this systematic review is to compare VBT and F2F psychotherapy in terms o

Record details

Published: 5 August 2026
Source: JMIR (Journal of Medical Internet Research)
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare
Retrieved: 6 August 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (5 August 2026), “Comparing Video-Based and Face-to-Face Psychotherapy: Systematic Review and Multilevel Meta-Analysis Across Mental Disorders,” evidence record 16728, https://ethics.ai/record/16728 (originally published by JMIR (Journal of Medical Internet Research)).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.