Evidence record 16360 · automatically gathered

Cognitive Workload and Mental Burden in Health Care Professionals Interacting With AI: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: AI adoption in health care has accelerated rapidly, with ambient documentation tools, diagnostic imaging AI, and clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) entering routine practice. However, the cognitive demands placed on clinicians supervising these systems remain understudied. Specifically, the concept of verification burden requires closer examination. Consequently, institutional decision-makers lack a structured, certainty-graded evidence base regarding the true impact of AI on

Record details

Published: 4 August 2026
Source: JMIR (Journal of Medical Internet Research)
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare
Retrieved: 5 August 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (4 August 2026), “Cognitive Workload and Mental Burden in Health Care Professionals Interacting With AI: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” evidence record 16360, https://ethics.ai/record/16360 (originally published by JMIR (Journal of Medical Internet Research)).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.