AI Security Leaderboard: Methodology, Results and Minimal Standard
Frontier AI model developers increasingly rely on layered safeguards to prevent catastrophic misuse, but little public evidence exists on how much protection these safeguards provide, or how consistently across developers. We introduce the FAR.AI Minimal Standard for Safeguards, Version 1.0: a taxonomy of 67 readily accessible static jailbreak techniques, a method for composing them into a very large attack space, and a benchmark of flagship models against a sample of it. We evaluate Claude Fabl
Record details
Published: 4 August 2026
Source: arXiv red teaming query
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment
Retrieved: 5 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
AI Security Leaderboard: Methodology, Results and Minimal Standard
arXiv red teaming query · 4 August 2026
ICO: Enhancing Semantic-Shift Jailbreaks via Iterative Context Optimization
arXiv red teaming query · 4 August 2026
Two religious chatbots walk into a bar: can religious identity prompts foster more pro-social LLM responses?
AI & Society · 4 August 2026
AS-FedBridge: Pseudo-Spike Bridge Distillation for Heterogeneous ANN-SNN Federated Learning
arXiv cs.LG · 4 August 2026
The Evolutionary Origin of Values: implications for AI alignment, sentience and existential risk
arXiv · 4 August 2026
Modality Agreement- and Conflict-Aware Prototype Hypergraph Learning for Multimodal Intent Understanding
arXiv cs.LG · 4 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (4 August 2026), “AI Security Leaderboard: Methodology, Results and Minimal Standard,” evidence record 16569, https://ethics.ai/record/16569 (originally published by arXiv red teaming query).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.