Modality Agreement- and Conflict-Aware Prototype Hypergraph Learning for Multimodal Intent Understanding
Multimodal intent recognition requires understanding not only what textual, acoustic, and visual signals share, but also how they disagree. Such disagreement is frequently class-informative; for example, lexical positivity accompanied by incongruent vocal or facial behavior may indicate sarcasm or taunting, yet most fusion methods either encourage modality alignment or treat inconsistency as uncertainty to be suppressed. We propose MACH (Modality Agreement- and Conflict-aware prototype Hypergrap
Record details
Published: 4 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.LG
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment
Retrieved: 6 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Policy Fragmentation or Institutional Alignment? Institutional Governance of AI in Universities and Business Schools
arXiv · 4 August 2026
The Evolutionary Origin of Values: implications for AI alignment, sentience and existential risk
arXiv · 4 August 2026
AS-FedBridge: Pseudo-Spike Bridge Distillation for Heterogeneous ANN-SNN Federated Learning
arXiv cs.LG · 4 August 2026
Risky Business: Measuring The Faithfulness-Safety Tension
arXiv · 4 August 2026
ICO: Enhancing Semantic-Shift Jailbreaks via Iterative Context Optimization
arXiv red teaming query · 4 August 2026
How Usable Are Geospatial Foundation Models? A Systematic Evaluation of 89 Models
arXiv cs.HC · 4 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (4 August 2026), “Modality Agreement- and Conflict-Aware Prototype Hypergraph Learning for Multimodal Intent Understanding,” evidence record 16982, https://ethics.ai/record/16982 (originally published by arXiv cs.LG).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.