Beyond Representational Similarity: Source-Conditioned Description-Length Gain for Generative Plagiarism Detection and Candidate Source Reranking
Large language models (LLMs) pose challenges to academic integrity and peer review. Yet generative plagiarism detection remains an underexplored and largely unresolved challenge. Prior work on LLM-generated-text detection targets AI involvement, which may be permissible, rather than source reuse, while similarity-based methods struggle after extensive rewriting and multi-source synthesis. Motivated by the description-length view of probabilistic prediction, in which relevant side information can
Record details
Published: 4 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.AI
Category: Research
Topics: Copyright & IP
Retrieved: 5 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Copyright Is the Headline; Capability Is the Blind Spot: AI Technology in the Book-Publishing Trade Press, November 2025--August 2026
arXiv cs.CY · 4 August 2026
Copyright governance for GenAI-assisted works: Insights from Chinese judicial practice
Telecommunications Policy · 7 August 2026
Stealing Reasoning Traces from Proprietary LLM APIs
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 9 August 2026
Stealing Reasoning Traces from Proprietary LLM APIs
arXiv cs.AI · 10 August 2026
Defending against Model Extraction for GNNs with Model Reprogramming
arXiv cs.CR (AI security) · 11 August 2026
Agentic Evaluation of Copyright Law Compliance
arXiv cs.CY · 27 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (4 August 2026), “Beyond Representational Similarity: Source-Conditioned Description-Length Gain for Generative Plagiarism Detection and Candidate Source Reranking,” evidence record 16546, https://ethics.ai/record/16546 (originally published by arXiv cs.AI).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.