Copyright Is the Headline; Capability Is the Blind Spot: AI Technology in the Book-Publishing Trade Press, November 2025--August 2026
arXiv:2608.00964v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This rapid evidence review examines 89 articles about artificial intelligence (AI) and book publishing published from November 1, 2025 through August 1, 2026. The purposive corpus spans English-, Chinese-, German-, French-, Spanish-, Portuguese-, Italian-, and Japanese-language publishing coverage; major-newspaper book coverage; and specialist technology commentators. Each item was coded for topic, stance, technical depth, and dominant voice. The p
Record details
Published: 4 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Copyright & IP
Retrieved: 4 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Copyright governance for GenAI-assisted works: Insights from Chinese judicial practice
Telecommunications Policy · 7 August 2026
China’s MiniMax curbs overseas access to new AI video model over copyright disputes
SCMP Tech (HK/CN) · 4 August 2026
China tightens chip-design protection and clarifies rights to spur innovation
SCMP Tech (HK/CN) · 3 August 2026
Japan’s “Principle Code” for Generative AI (Part 2): What the Public Consultations Reveal
Baker McKenzie Connect On Tech · 29 July 2026
Advanced technologies now account for 1 in 6 valid invention patents in China
SCMP Tech (HK/CN) · 29 July 2026
China’s free AI models may not stay free, Goldman says
The Next Web AI · 28 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (4 August 2026), “Copyright Is the Headline; Capability Is the Blind Spot: AI Technology in the Book-Publishing Trade Press, November 2025--August 2026,” evidence record 15824, https://ethics.ai/record/15824 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.