LLM Agents for Deliberative Collaboration: A Study on Joint Decision Making Under Partial Observability
Deliberation plays a crucial role in collaboration; when humans work together, they naturally engage in communication to align information and reach an agreement. In this paper, we investigate deliberative large language model (LLM) agents under partially observable joint decision-making tasks. We formalize deliberative collaboration as a cooperative joint decision problem with partial and asymmetric observations, and introduce a scalable benchmark that instantiates this problem across multiple
Record details
Published: 7 July 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Agents & autonomy · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Behavioral Privacy Leakage in Agentic Negotiation: Formalizing and Mitigating Inference Attacks via Randomized Policies
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 6 July 2026
Formal Mechanisms for Market Stability in Self-Interested Agent Societies: A Marketplace Simulation Study
arXiv red teaming query · 9 July 2026
Agentic and Generative AI for Open-Source Intelligence and Cyber Investigations: Taxonomy, Evaluation, Challenges, and Future Directions
arXiv · 3 July 2026
How Do Practitioners Build SE Agents? Insights from a Mixed-Methods Study
arXiv cs.HC · 12 July 2026
A field experiment of social influence and behavioral contagion with bots on Reddit
arXiv · 1 July 2026
Heuristic Learning for Active Flow Control Using Coding Agents
arXiv cs.AI · 13 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (7 July 2026), “LLM Agents for Deliberative Collaboration: A Study on Joint Decision Making Under Partial Observability,” evidence record 163, https://ethics.ai/record/163 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.