Implementing Causal Perception: Competing SCMs and Situated Fairness
Causal perception occurs when agents with competing Structural Causal Models (SCMs) of the same system infer different probability distributions, including the hypothetical distributions implied by each agent's SCM under the same set of interventions. It shapes how agents reason about the system and how they perceive its fairness. Causal perception is a promising probabilistic framework, but it has remained purely theoretical. This work provides the first implementation of the causal perception
Record details
Published: 4 August 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 5 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Video-DeepResearch: Towards the Next-Generation Multimodal Deepresearch Agent
arXiv cs.AI · 4 August 2026
Video-DeepResearch: Towards the Next-Generation Multimodal Deepresearch Agent
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 3 August 2026
Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Radio Resource Management under Coupled Finite-Horizon Constraints
arXiv fairness query · 3 August 2026
Douyin Multimodal Embedding Model Technical Report
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 2 August 2026
Inference-Time Policy Alignment for Fair Reinforcement Learning
arXiv fairness query · 31 July 2026
Paying for Honesty Without Knowing the Truth: Reputation-Penalty Design for LLM Marketplace Agents
arXiv cs.AI · 30 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (4 August 2026), “Implementing Causal Perception: Competing SCMs and Situated Fairness,” evidence record 16262, https://ethics.ai/record/16262 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.