A Contractualist Argumentation Framework for Moral Decision-Making
Autonomous agents operating in shared environments must make decisions that affect multiple individuals with potentially conflicting interests. We propose a formal framework for moral decision-making grounded in Scanlon's contractualism, an ethical theory that evaluates the permissibility of actions in terms of principles that no one could reasonably reject. To operationalise contractualist reasoning, we use ASPIC+, a structured argumentation framework, extended with value-based filtering to mod
Record details
Published: 3 August 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Agents & autonomy · Environment
Retrieved: 4 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
A Contractualist Argumentation Framework for Moral Decision-Making
arXiv cs.CY · 4 August 2026
Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Radio Resource Management under Coupled Finite-Horizon Constraints
arXiv fairness query · 3 August 2026
Agentic Commerce World: An Auditable and Verifiable Environment for Vibe Commerce
arXiv cs.AI · 3 August 2026
AtumAI: A Principled Framework for Agentic Generation of Datacenter Control-Plane Policies
arXiv cs.AI · 3 August 2026
Securing Agentic AI: From Per-Action Checks to Trajectory Assurance
arXiv · 3 August 2026
Predictive vision-language monitoring for proactive safety in robot task execution
Frontiers in Robotics and AI · 3 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (3 August 2026), “A Contractualist Argumentation Framework for Moral Decision-Making,” evidence record 15890, https://ethics.ai/record/15890 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.