Does online sustainability communication shape public discourse? Insights from six years of tenant-housing provider interactions
arXiv:2607.08437v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Authorities increasingly rely on social media to advance sustainability transitions, infrastructure investment, and service reform. Yet how citizens respond to these digital communications remains poorly understood. Existing approaches rely on aggregate engagement metrics (e.g., likes), providing limited insight into discourse structure and quality. We developed a data-driven, multidimensional framework to analyse how social media communication
Record details
Published: 3 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 3 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Does online sustainability communication shape public discourse? Insights from six years of tenant-housing provider interactions
arXiv · 9 July 2026
Privacy Cards for Surfacing Mental Models and Exploring Privacy Concerns: A Case Study of Voice-First Ambient Interfaces with Older Adults
arXiv cs.CY · 3 August 2026
The Deployment Wall: A Diagnostic Framework and Instrument for Enterprise AI in the Deployment Era
arXiv cs.CY · 3 August 2026
Hidden Errors in Big Data: The Case of Property Records
arXiv cs.CY · 3 August 2026
Scaffolding Critical Engagement with GenAI: Transforming Ethnic Minority Preparatory Students' Collaborative Discourse in Prompt Engineering Tasks
arXiv cs.CY · 3 August 2026
CellPrism: A Visual Analytics System for Exploring AI-Driven Virtual Cells in Drug Discovery
arXiv cs.HC · 3 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (3 August 2026), “Does online sustainability communication shape public discourse? Insights from six years of tenant-housing provider interactions,” evidence record 15654, https://ethics.ai/record/15654 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.