Responsible Personalisation: The Double-Edged Sword of Personalisation in Human-Robot Interaction
While personalisation is becoming a defining capability in human-robot interaction (HRI), the existing literature on responsible personalisation remains fragmented, offering isolated accounts of ethical risks without a structured understanding of how they emerge across interaction contexts. This gap is particularly critical in HRI, where robots' embodiment and social presence can amplify and reshape such risks or generate new types of risks. We present a lifecycle-based and context-sensitive fra
Record details
Published: 7 July 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
SPEAR: A Simulator for Photorealistic Embodied AI Research
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 7 July 2026
An Experimental Design Approach to Evaluating Agentic AI's Autonomous Model Discovery
arXiv · 7 July 2026
From Dashboards to Agents: The Future of Data Visualization
Harvard Kennedy School · 7 July 2026
LLM Agents for Deliberative Collaboration: A Study on Joint Decision Making Under Partial Observability
arXiv · 7 July 2026
Reliable and Developer-Aligned Evaluation of Agents for Software Engineering
arXiv · 7 July 2026
From Blueprint to Reality: Modeling and Applying Putnam's Social Capital Theory with LLM-based Multi-agent Simulations
arXiv · 7 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (7 July 2026), “Responsible Personalisation: The Double-Edged Sword of Personalisation in Human-Robot Interaction,” evidence record 156, https://ethics.ai/record/156 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.