Evidence record 15309 · automatically gathered

Is Deep Research Reliable? Misleading Knowledge Induces False Conclusions

Deep Research agents extend LLM-based assistants into long-horizon workflows involving planning, retrieval, evidence synthesis, and report generation, yet their reliability in open information environments remains underexplored. A key concern is whether apparently credible but factually misleading knowledge encountered in such environments can propagate through these workflows and be adopted as false conclusions in final reports. To study this failure mode, we introduce MisKnow-Agent, a framewor

Record details

Published: 22 July 2026
Source: HuggingFace Daily Papers
Category: Research
Topics: Agents & autonomy · Environment
Retrieved: 1 August 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (22 July 2026), “Is Deep Research Reliable? Misleading Knowledge Induces False Conclusions,” evidence record 15309, https://ethics.ai/record/15309 (originally published by HuggingFace Daily Papers).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.