Didact: A Cross-Domain Capability Discovery System for Defence
Policymakers in defence and defence-aligned sectors must monitor rapidly evolving research alongside sector priorities relevant to operational and strategic needs. In practice, these sources are fragmented across heterogeneous formats, disjoint repositories, and siloed update streams, making capability discovery slow and difficult to audit. We present Didact, a prototype that integrates publicly available defence reports and policy documents from Australia with a purpose-built knowledge graph de
Record details
Published: 5 June 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Military & security · Transparency
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Explainable AI-Driven Cyber Risk Analytics and Model Reliability Assessment for Intelligent Governance of U.S. Critical Infrastructure: An XGBoost and SHAP-Based Intrusion Detection Framework
arXiv · 4 June 2026
CEDAR-42001: From ISO/IEC 42001 Conformity to Architecture-Aware, Audit-Visible Assurance Posture for AI Cyber-Physical Systems
arXiv · 19 June 2026
Problem of (In)Explainability in Testing Fully Autonomous Weapon Systems for International Humanitarian Law Compliance
Minds and Machines · 10 July 2026
enclawed: A Configurable, Sector-Neutral Hardening Framework for Single-User AI Assistant Gateways
arXiv · 18 April 2026
TRACE-CTI: Auditable Post-Extraction Governance of TTP Claims with Knowledge Graphs
arXiv cs.AI · 27 July 2026
A First Look at Coding Agents' Compliance with AI Contribution Rules in Open-Source Communities
arXiv cs.AI · 29 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (5 June 2026), “Didact: A Cross-Domain Capability Discovery System for Defence,” evidence record 1384, https://ethics.ai/record/1384 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.