Why Public Service AI Governance Frameworks Risk Failing in the Age of General-Purpose AI: Lessons from Policing
arXiv:2607.25648v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Public services face growing pressure to adopt artificial intelligence (AI) to close the gap between rising demand and falling resources. That pressure has intensified with general-purpose AI (GPAI): AI built on large language models that can be directed by prompt alone to perform an effectively unbounded range of tasks. We argue that the properties that make these models attractive - their generality, accessibility, and low deployment cost - under
Record details
Published: 29 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation
Retrieved: 29 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Why Public Service AI Governance Frameworks Risk Failing in the Age of General-Purpose AI: Lessons from Policing
arXiv · 28 July 2026
Using Fine-Tuned LLMs to Identify Indicators of Vulnerability in UK Police Incident Logs
arXiv cs.CY · 22 July 2026
When Algorithms Meet Artists: Semantic Compression and Stake-holder Marginalisation in Public AI-Art Discourse (2013-2025)
arXiv cs.CY · 29 July 2026
How experience moderates the impact of AI suggestions on researchers' perceptions of their ideas
Research Policy · 29 July 2026
Continuous assurance for AI-driven clinical decision support systems
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · 29 July 2026
Information bubble and skill evolution: a theoretical framework for integrating distributed cognition, cognition offloading, and metacognitive regulation based on AIOE
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · 29 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (29 July 2026), “Why Public Service AI Governance Frameworks Risk Failing in the Age of General-Purpose AI: Lessons from Policing,” evidence record 14097, https://ethics.ai/record/14097 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.