When Algorithms Meet Artists: Semantic Compression and Stake-holder Marginalisation in Public AI-Art Discourse (2013-2025)
arXiv:2508.03037v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Artists occupy a paradoxical position in generative AI. Their own work trains models that now compete with them, replicate their styles, and reshape the creative economy they inhabit. Yet whether artist concerns achieve proportional representation in the public discourse that shapes AI governance remains an open empirical question. We mapped the semantic landscape of public AI-art discourse from 2013 to 2025, drawing on 1,736 text chunks
Record details
Published: 29 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Jobs & economy
Retrieved: 29 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
The Human Utility Factor: A Computable Welfare Metric That Reframes AI Governance as a Constrained Optimisation Problem
arXiv cs.CY · 30 July 2026
Scaling, Lock-In, and Proxy Compliance: A Political Economy of Responsible AI
arXiv · 30 July 2026
Scaling, Lock-In, and Proxy Compliance: A Political Economy of Responsible AI
arXiv cs.CY · 31 July 2026
COntExt: Towards Context-Aware Ontology Extension from Operational Metrics
arXiv cs.AI · 31 July 2026
Governance-driven agility and innovation in metaverse adoption: Evidence from Pakistan's frontier economy
Technology in Society · 25 July 2026
Who Governs the AI Boom?
Harvard Kennedy School · 2 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (29 July 2026), “When Algorithms Meet Artists: Semantic Compression and Stake-holder Marginalisation in Public AI-Art Discourse (2013-2025),” evidence record 14114, https://ethics.ai/record/14114 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.