Evidence record 13591 · automatically gathered

A Comparative Benchmark of Federated Learning Strategies for Mortality Prediction on Heterogeneous and Imbalanced Clinical Data

arXiv:2509.10517v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Machine learning can predict in-hospital mortality, but data privacy and the statistical heterogeneity of clinical data hamper its use. Federated Learning (FL) is privacy-preserving, yet its behavior under non-IID and imbalanced conditions needs scrutiny. We benchmark five FL strategies - FedAvg, FedProx, FedAdagrad, FedAdam, and FedCluster - for mortality prediction on the MIMIC-IV dataset, partitioning 466,351 admissions across five car

Record details

Published: 27 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Privacy · Healthcare
Retrieved: 27 July 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (27 July 2026), “A Comparative Benchmark of Federated Learning Strategies for Mortality Prediction on Heterogeneous and Imbalanced Clinical Data,” evidence record 13591, https://ethics.ai/record/13591 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.