Evidence record 12746 · automatically gathered

Pragmatic defence of the register system: strengthening Clarkes consequentialist case for managing conscientious objection

Introduction The debate over conscientious objection (CO) in healthcare remains deeply polarised, often framed as a clash between professional obligations and individual moral integrity. In their consequentialist defence of permitting CO, Steve Clarke proposes a region-based register of non-objecting professionals as a mechanism to minimise reliance on referrals—what they aptly term a ‘fight without fighting’ approach. This commentary supports Clarke’s core argument but s

Record details

Published: 22 July 2026
Source: Journal of Medical Ethics (BMJ)
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare · Military & security
Retrieved: 23 July 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (22 July 2026), “Pragmatic defence of the register system: strengthening Clarkes consequentialist case for managing conscientious objection,” evidence record 12746, https://ethics.ai/record/12746 (originally published by Journal of Medical Ethics (BMJ)).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.