Public perceptions of AI-driven decision-making in healthcare: A structural equation modeling approach
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into healthcare to support diagnostics, decision-making, and administrative processes. However, the successful implementation of AI depends not only on technical performance but also on public perceptions of its helpfulness, riskiness, and fairness. This study examines public perceptions of automated decision-making (ADM) in healthcare. Data were drawn from the first wave of an ongoing longitudinal survey panel. The final sample consisted o
Record details
Published: 21 July 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Healthcare
Retrieved: 22 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Quality Action Assurance: Multimodal Verification of Examiner Claims in VR OSCEs
arXiv · 21 July 2026
Trustworthy Privacy-Preserving Multimodal Federated Learning for Personalised Breast Cancer Prediction
arXiv · 21 July 2026
Equity-Oriented Design Processes and Evaluation of Digital Health Technologies for Black Communities Beyond Usability: Scoping Review
JMIR (Journal of Medical Internet Research) · 20 July 2026
AI interventions in cancer screening: balancing equity and cost-effectiveness
Journal of Medical Ethics (BMJ) · 22 July 2026
Certified in Theory, Broken in Practice: Assumption Gaps in Cryptographic Model Certification
arXiv cs.CR (AI security) · 23 July 2026
“Antisocial Today and Also Always”?: A Qualitative Examination of Engineering Students’ Social Considerations in Robot Design for Healthcare
Science and Engineering Ethics · 24 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (21 July 2026), “Public perceptions of AI-driven decision-making in healthcare: A structural equation modeling approach,” evidence record 12348, https://ethics.ai/record/12348 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.