Dual Adversarial Fine-tuning for Enhancing Robustness of Large Vision Language Model
While Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs), represented by LLaVA and GPT-4V, have demonstrated remarkable capabilities, their visual inputs remain vulnerable to adversarial attacks, posing significant security risks. Existing defense methods predominantly target single-task scenarios (e.g., zero-shot classification) and consequently lack generalizability across various multimodal tasks. To address this limitation, we propose a dual adversarial fine-tuning framework that jointly optimizes visual
Record details
Published: 21 July 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Military & security
Retrieved: 22 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Hybrid Latent-Structural Fusion (HLSF) for Cyber Anomaly Detection
arXiv red teaming query · 20 July 2026
DARWIN: Evolving Jailbreak Adversary and Guardrail for LLM Safety Evaluation and Protection
arXiv red teaming query · 22 July 2026
Pragmatic defence of the register system: strengthening Clarkes consequentialist case for managing conscientious objection
Journal of Medical Ethics (BMJ) · 22 July 2026
Dynamic Defense Profiling Enables Cognitive Jailbreak of Text-to-Image Models
arXiv red teaming query · 20 July 2026
Persona-as-Configuration: Generative Stakeholder Reporting for Agricultural Floods
arXiv · 20 July 2026
Advancing Software for National Security
Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute · 20 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (21 July 2026), “Dual Adversarial Fine-tuning for Enhancing Robustness of Large Vision Language Model,” evidence record 12345, https://ethics.ai/record/12345 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.