Soul Computing: A Theoretical Framework and Technical Architecture for Intelligent Agents with Independent Consciousness
Breakthroughs in large language models and multimodal generation technologies have propelled the digital reconstruction of human mental traits, emotional patterns, and long-term memory from science fiction toward engineering practice. Yet current research and industry practices at the intersection of AI and digital humans remain hampered by fundamental conceptual ambiguities: the essential differences between next-generation intelligent agents and traditional virtual humans, the construction pat
Record details
Published: 9 June 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
A Practical Recipe Towards Improving Sim-and-Real Correlation for VLA Evaluation
arXiv · 9 June 2026
Decoupling Thought from Speech: Knowledge-Grounded Counterfactual Reasoning for Resilient Multi-Agent Argumentation
arXiv · 9 June 2026
The Confident Liar: Diagnosing Multi-Agent Debate with Log-Probabilities and LLM-as-Judge
arXiv · 9 June 2026
Expected Free Energy-based Planning as Variational Inference
arXiv · 9 June 2026
Causal Ensemble Agent: Hierarchical Causal Discovery with LLM-guided Expert Reweighting
arXiv · 9 June 2026
SafeGEO: Understanding Generative Engine Optimization Risks in Recommendation Agents
arXiv · 8 June 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (9 June 2026), “Soul Computing: A Theoretical Framework and Technical Architecture for Intelligent Agents with Independent Consciousness,” evidence record 1222, https://ethics.ai/record/1222 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.