A Formally Grounded ODRL Evaluator: Implementation and Comparison
The ODRL policy language is emerging as the de-facto standard for policy modelling data access and usage preferences, AI governance policies and data workflows in European dataspaces. The current standard has no mathematical formal semantics to describe how a system should implement policy evaluation. This has resulted in a variety of systems and tools that implement their own interpretation of the language, which limits interoperability and cannot guarantee consistent results. Based on an exist
Record details
Published: 17 July 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation
Retrieved: 20 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
AI Watermark Evidence Fails Forensic Readiness: An Empirical Evaluation
arXiv · 17 July 2026
Traccia: An OpenTelemetry-Based Governance Platform for AI Systems
arXiv cs.CY · 17 July 2026
Post-Deployment Accountability in AI Governance: A Cross-Regulatory Empirical Analysis of AI Incidents
arXiv cs.CY · 16 July 2026
Traccia: An OpenTelemetry-Based Governance Platform for AI Systems
arXiv · 15 July 2026
AI Watermark Evidence Fails Forensic Readiness: An Empirical Evaluation
arXiv cs.CY · 20 July 2026
Privacy Preserving Recommender Systems Balancing Personalization with Privacy
arXiv · 14 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (17 July 2026), “A Formally Grounded ODRL Evaluator: Implementation and Comparison,” evidence record 11762, https://ethics.ai/record/11762 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.