Least privilege for AI agents: Identity, access, and tool binding
As AI agents become more autonomous, strong identity, access, and auditing controls are critical to keeping them secure.
Record details
Published: 16 July 2026
Source: Microsoft Responsible AI
Category: Field notes
Topics: Agents & autonomy · Transparency
Retrieved: 17 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Directly Responsible Individuals (DRI)
Simon Willisons Weblog · 12 July 2026
AI Leaders Propose SAFE Guidelines for Cybersecurity Transparency
NVIDIA Blog (AI) · 4 August 2026
Memory-Driven Self-Disclosure and Relational Turning Points: A Longitudinal Multimodal Study of Human-AI Interaction
arXiv cs.HC · 16 July 2026
Auditing Asset-Specific Preferences in Financial Large Language Models: Evidence from Bitcoin Representations and Portfolio Allocation
arXiv cs.CY · 16 July 2026
Digital Pantheon: Simulating and Auditing Coalition Formation with LLM Agents
arXiv · 16 July 2026
Digital Pantheon: Simulating and Auditing Coalition Formation with LLM Agents
arXiv · 16 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (16 July 2026), “Least privilege for AI agents: Identity, access, and tool binding,” evidence record 11317, https://ethics.ai/record/11317 (originally published by Microsoft Responsible AI).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.