Digital Pantheon: Simulating and Auditing Coalition Formation with LLM Agents
The formation of political coalitions is a complex negotiation driven by both concrete policy objectives and deep-seated ideological convictions. While Large Language Models (LLMs) open new avenues for computational political science, the neutrality and helpfulness biases instilled by Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) prevent them from sustaining steadfast partisan behaviour. We present a multi-agent framework that reconciles factual grounding with ideological alignment by combin
Record details
Published: 16 July 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Safety & alignment · Agents & autonomy · Transparency
Retrieved: 20 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Digital Pantheon: Simulating and Auditing Coalition Formation with LLM Agents
arXiv · 16 July 2026
Regulating the Machine Contributor: Governance and Policy Alignment in Open Source
arXiv · 12 June 2026
REBAR: Reference Ethical Benchmark for Autonomy Readiness
arXiv · 18 May 2026
Cognitive Comparability and the Limits of Governance: Evaluating Authority Under Radical Capability Asymmetry
arXiv · 3 April 2026
COMPASS: The explainable agentic framework for Sovereignty, Sustainability, Compliance, and Ethics
arXiv · 11 March 2026
Traccia: An OpenTelemetry-Based Governance Platform for AI Systems
arXiv cs.CY · 17 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (16 July 2026), “Digital Pantheon: Simulating and Auditing Coalition Formation with LLM Agents,” evidence record 11783, https://ethics.ai/record/11783 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.