Demographic Patterns in Cybersecurity Culture: Insights from a Global Organisation Supporting Safety-Critical and Critical Infrastructure Sectors
This study investigates demographic differences in cybersecurity culture in a large global organisation supporting safety critical and critical infrastructure sectors to target CSC improvement. A global survey was administered to all internal and external employees of a total of 21148 employees, with 6502 responses. The questionnaire evaluates nine CSC dimensions such as Password Management, Governance, Email Use. Anonymous survey responses were analysed using Kruskal-Wallis tests and Dunns post
Record details
Published: 12 June 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Odds Law: The Decomposition Algebra On How Intelligence Organizes Itself to Solve Difficult Problems Reliably
arXiv · 14 June 2026
AI Researchers Must Help Lead Arms Control to Mitigate Military AI Risks
arXiv · 10 June 2026
A Practical Recipe Towards Improving Sim-and-Real Correlation for VLA Evaluation
arXiv · 9 June 2026
Federating Governance: How Community Rules Scale with Mastodon Instances
arXiv · 3 June 2026
The Geometry of Refusal: Linear Instability in Safety-Aligned LLMs
arXiv · 21 June 2026
What Intermediate Layers Know: Detecting Jailbreaks from Entropy Dynamics
arXiv · 23 June 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (12 June 2026), “Demographic Patterns in Cybersecurity Culture: Insights from a Global Organisation Supporting Safety-Critical and Critical Infrastructure Sectors,” evidence record 1056, https://ethics.ai/record/1056 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.