Influencing public acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare delivery
Introduction Despite the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) to transform healthcare delivery and reduce costs, adoption remains uneven across populations. Understanding the demographic, behavioral, and cognitive factors influencing public willingness to use AI-powered health tools is critical for equitable implementation. This study examined determinants of AI adoption in healthcare among adults in the United States (U.S.). Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted between March and
Record details
Published: 13 January 2026
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Evaluating the Effectiveness of 2024–2025 Seasonal mRNA-1273 Vaccination Against COVID-19-Related Hospitalizations and Medically Attended COVID-19 Among Adults Aged ≥ 18 years in the United States: An Observational Matched Cohort Study
OpenAlex · 10 January 2026
Final Report for the Workshop on Robotics & AI in Medicine
arXiv · 18 March 2026
Empathic and agentic artificial intelligence in nursing: perspectives on a human-centered framework for cancer care navigation in the United States
arXiv · 11 April 2026
Benchmarking the Safety of Large Language Models for Robotic Health Attendant Control
arXiv · 29 April 2026
Staging by the Book: Automatic Sleep Stage Classification Using Scoring Rules
arXiv · 19 May 2026
AI Sovereignty as National Learning Capacity: A Human-Centered Learning Mechanics Viewpoint on France, the United States, and China
arXiv · 30 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (13 January 2026), “Influencing public acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare delivery,” evidence record 9993, https://ethics.ai/record/9993 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.