AI ethics evidence index Search
Source-linked daily record
Evidence record 9961 · automatically gathered

Charting cross-cultural AI perception: An exploratory study of expectations, risk–benefit trade-offs, and values in Germany and China

=.839). Visual cognitive maps illustrate these contrasts, offering new perspectives on how cultural contexts shape AI acceptance. Our findings suggest factors influencing public perception and provide pointers for future research to align AI with societal values and promote equitable and culturally sensitive integration of AI technologies.

Record details

Published: 9 June 2026
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: unclassified
Retrieved: 14 July 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

Same region: China

System Report for CCL25-Eval Task 5: New Dataset and LoRA-Fine-Tuned Qwen2.5

arXiv · 10 June 2026

Same region: China

Jury Duty: Calibration and Orientation Failures in MLLM-as-a-Judge Under Cultural Ambiguity

arXiv · 12 June 2026

Same region: China

CHILLGuard: Towards Fine-Grained Chinese LLM Safety Guardrail with Scalable Data Construction and Model-aware Preference Alignment

arXiv · 13 June 2026

Same region: China

AlignAtt4LLM: Fast AlignAtt for Decoder-Only LLMs at IWSLT 2026 Simultaneous Speech Translation Task

arXiv · 2 June 2026

Same region: China

From Democracies to Autocracies: How AI Systems Enable Authoritarianism by Design

arXiv · 15 June 2026

Same region: China

Understanding the "Airport" Censorship Circumvention Ecosystem in China

arXiv · 16 June 2026

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (9 June 2026), “Charting cross-cultural AI perception: An exploratory study of expectations, risk–benefit trade-offs, and values in Germany and China,” evidence record 9961, https://ethics.ai/record/9961 (originally published by OpenAlex).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.