MindAlign: Decoding Inner Speech from fMRI Signals via Multimodal Embedding Alignment under Limited Data
Decoding inner speech from non-invasive brain signals remains a fundamental challenge due to the absence of overt linguistic output, limited training data, and large inter-subject variability. Existing brain-to-text approaches often rely on task-specific decoder fine-tuning, which restricts scalability and complicates adaptation to new participants. We propose MindAlign, a decoupled two-stage brain-to-language framework that enables open-ended text generation from fMRI signals without modifying
Record details
Published: 15 June 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
An Evaluation of Data Leakage Risks in Tool-Using LLM Agents in Realistic Scenarios
arXiv · 15 June 2026
Learning aligned EEG representations with subject-specific encoders
arXiv · 15 June 2026
SpecAlign: Efficient Specification-Grounded Alignment of Large Language Models via Synthetic Data
arXiv · 15 June 2026
AuAu: A Benchmark for Auditing Authoritarian Alignment in Large Language Models
arXiv · 15 June 2026
Decoupling Semantics from Distortions: Multi-Scale Two-Stream Vision-Language Alignment for AI-Generated Image Quality Assessment
arXiv · 15 June 2026
Adaptive and Explicit safe: Triggering Latent Safety Awareness in Large Reasoning Models
arXiv · 15 June 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (15 June 2026), “MindAlign: Decoding Inner Speech from fMRI Signals via Multimodal Embedding Alignment under Limited Data,” evidence record 970, https://ethics.ai/record/970 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.