Benchmarking large language models’ performances for myopia care: a comparative analysis of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4.0, and Google Bard
BACKGROUND: Large language models (LLMs) are garnering wide interest due to their human-like and contextually relevant responses. However, LLMs' accuracy across specific medical domains has yet been thoroughly evaluated. Myopia is a frequent topic which patients and parents commonly seek information online. Our study evaluated the performance of three LLMs namely ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4.0, and Google Bard, in delivering accurate responses to common myopia-related queries. METHODS: We curated thir
Record details
Published: 22 August 2023
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Large language models provide unsafe answers to patient-posed medical questions
OpenAlex · 13 February 2026
When AI Takes the Couch: Psychometric Jailbreaks Reveal Internal Conflict in Frontier Models
arXiv cs.CY · 21 July 2026
Socioeconomic Inference in LLM Medical Triage: Same Symptoms, Different ZIP Code
arXiv cs.CY · 28 July 2026
Hearsay: Vision-Language Medical Diagnoses Without an Image
arXiv cs.AI · 29 July 2026
Performance of 5 Large Language Models in Perioperative Consultation for Pediatric Hypospadias: Cross-Sectional Comparative Study
JMIR (Journal of Medical Internet Research) · 29 July 2026
The Reliability of LLMs for Medical Diagnosis: An Examination of Consistency, Manipulation, and Contextual Awareness
arXiv cs.CY · 30 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (22 August 2023), “Benchmarking large language models’ performances for myopia care: a comparative analysis of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4.0, and Google Bard,” evidence record 9460, https://ethics.ai/record/9460 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.