ChatGPT in medicine: an overview of its applications, advantages, limitations, future prospects, and ethical considerations
This paper presents an analysis of the advantages, limitations, ethical considerations, future prospects, and practical applications of ChatGPT and artificial intelligence (AI) in the healthcare and medical domains. ChatGPT is an advanced language model that uses deep learning techniques to produce human-like responses to natural language inputs. It is part of the family of generative pre-training transformer (GPT) models developed by OpenAI and is currently one of the largest publicly available
Record details
Published: 4 May 2023
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
User Intentions to Use ChatGPT for Self-Diagnosis and Health-Related Purposes: Cross-sectional Survey Study
OpenAlex · 9 May 2023
Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers
OpenAlex · 26 April 2023
Reliability of Medical Information Provided by ChatGPT: Assessment Against Clinical Guidelines and Patient Information Quality Instrument
OpenAlex · 15 June 2023
Utility of ChatGPT in Clinical Practice
OpenAlex · 15 June 2023
ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns
OpenAlex · 19 March 2023
ChatDoctor: A Medical Chat Model Fine-Tuned on a Large Language Model Meta-AI (LLaMA) Using Medical Domain Knowledge
OpenAlex · 24 June 2023
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (4 May 2023), “ChatGPT in medicine: an overview of its applications, advantages, limitations, future prospects, and ethical considerations,” evidence record 9279, https://ethics.ai/record/9279 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.