Explainable medical imaging AI needs human-centered design: guidelines and evidence from a systematic review
Transparency in Machine Learning (ML), often also referred to as interpretability or explainability, attempts to reveal the working mechanisms of complex models. From a human-centered design perspective, transparency is not a property of the ML model but an affordance, i.e., a relationship between algorithm and users. Thus, prototyping and user evaluations are critical to attaining solutions that afford transparency. Following human-centered design principles in highly specialized and high stake
Record details
Published: 19 October 2022
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment · Healthcare · Transparency
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Transparency of AI in Healthcare as a Multilayered System of Accountabilities: Between Legal Requirements and Technical Limitations
OpenAlex · 30 May 2022
The role of explainable artificial intelligence in disease prediction: a systematic literature review and future research directions
OpenAlex · 4 March 2025
Interpretable Clustering: A Survey
OpenAlex · 16 January 2026
Human in the loop artificial intelligence in healthcare: applications, outcomes, and implementation challenges
OpenAlex · 19 February 2026
Emulating Clinician Cognition via Self-Evolving Deep Clinical Research
arXiv · 11 March 2026
Adoption and Effectiveness of AI-Based Anomaly Detection for Cross Provider Health Data Exchange
arXiv · 19 March 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (19 October 2022), “Explainable medical imaging AI needs human-centered design: guidelines and evidence from a systematic review,” evidence record 9200, https://ethics.ai/record/9200 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.