Federated Learning in a Medical Context: A Systematic Literature Review
Data privacy is a very important issue. Especially in fields like medicine, it is paramount to abide by the existing privacy regulations to preserve patients’ anonymity. However, data is required for research and training machine learning models that could help gain insight into complex correlations or personalised treatments that may otherwise stay undiscovered. Those models generally scale with the amount of data available, but the current situation often prohibits building large databases acr
Record details
Published: 2 June 2021
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Privacy · Healthcare
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Swarm Learning for decentralized and confidential clinical machine learning
OpenAlex · 26 May 2021
Explainable AI for Healthcare 5.0: Opportunities and Challenges
OpenAlex · 1 January 2022
Verification, analytical validation, and clinical validation (V3): the foundation of determining fit-for-purpose for Biometric Monitoring Technologies (BioMeTs)
OpenAlex · 14 April 2020
Legal, regulatory, and ethical frameworks for development of standards in artificial intelligence (AI) and autonomous robotic surgery
OpenAlex · 6 November 2018
Ethical Issues for Direct-to-Consumer Digital Psychotherapy Apps: Addressing Accountability, Data Protection, and Consent
OpenAlex · 23 April 2018
AI Ethics: Integrating Transparency, Fairness, and Privacy in AI Development
OpenAlex · 7 February 2025
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (2 June 2021), “Federated Learning in a Medical Context: A Systematic Literature Review,” evidence record 9021, https://ethics.ai/record/9021 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.