Microsoft Academic Graph: When experts are not enough
An ongoing project explores the extent to which artificial intelligence (AI), specifically in the areas of natural language processing and semantic reasoning, can be exploited to facilitate the studies of science by deploying software agents equipped with natural language understanding capabilities to read scholarly publications on the web. The knowledge extracted by these AI agents is organized into a heterogeneous graph, called Microsoft Academic Graph (MAG), where the nodes and the edges repr
Record details
Published: 23 January 2020
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Owner-Harm: A Missing Threat Model for AI Agent Safety
arXiv · 20 April 2026
Bespoke Visual Assistance: What and How do Blind and Low-Vision People Create with Agentic Programming?
arXiv cs.HC · 23 July 2026
Characterizing Visual Accessibility Issues in AI Developer Tools: An Empirical Study
arXiv cs.HC · 5 August 2026
Agentic AI Development Services
UK Contracts Finder — AI procurement · 22 June 2026
Claude Meets Blackwell Ultra: Anthropic’s Models Now Run on NVIDIA GB300 in Azure
NVIDIA Blog (AI) · 29 June 2026
Co Pilot and Agentic Stack Business Change, Adoption & Assurance
UK Contracts Finder — AI procurement · 2 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (23 January 2020), “Microsoft Academic Graph: When experts are not enough,” evidence record 8778, https://ethics.ai/record/8778 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.