Who Will Be the Members of Society 5.0? Towards an Anthropology of Technologically Posthumanized Future Societies
The Government of Japan’s “Society 5.0” initiative aims to create a cyber-physical society in which (among other things) citizens’ daily lives will be enhanced through increasingly close collaboration with artificially intelligent systems. However, an apparent paradox lies at the heart of efforts to create a more “human-centered” society in which human beings will live alongside a proliferating array of increasingly autonomous social robots and embodied AI. This study seeks to investigate the pr
Record details
Published: 10 May 2019
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Military & security · Agents & autonomy · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Agentic and Generative AI for Open-Source Intelligence and Cyber Investigations: Taxonomy, Evaluation, Challenges, and Future Directions
arXiv · 3 July 2026
Portugal to purchase three frigates from Italy’s Fincantieri: Meloni
Breaking Defense (AI) · 20 July 2026
Boss of startup hacked by rogue OpenAI agent urges ‘radical transparency’ in investigation
The Guardian · 27 July 2026
Chinese Actor Weaponizes Deepseek AI Agent to Attack Security Firm
Dark Reading (AI security) · 3 August 2026
Army shifts autonomy strategy to lean more on ‘awesome vendors’
Breaking Defense (AI) · 12 August 2026
Autonomous weapons systems, killer robots and human dignity
OpenAlex · 6 December 2018
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (10 May 2019), “Who Will Be the Members of Society 5.0? Towards an Anthropology of Technologically Posthumanized Future Societies,” evidence record 8609, https://ethics.ai/record/8609 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.