Robots in the Workplace: a Threat to—or Opportunity for—Meaningful Work?
Abstract The concept of meaningful work has recently received increased attention in philosophy and other disciplines. However, the impact of the increasing robotization of the workplace on meaningful work has received very little attention so far. Doing work that is meaningful leads to higher job satisfaction and increased worker well-being, and some argue for a right to access to meaningful work. In this paper, we therefore address the impact of robotization on meaningful work. We do so by ide
Record details
Published: 1 November 2019
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Jobs & economy · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Automation, Algorithms, and Beyond: Why Work Design Matters More Than Ever in a Digital World
OpenAlex · 30 December 2019
Agriculture 4.0: Broadening Responsible Innovation in an Era of Smart Farming
OpenAlex · 20 December 2018
Brave new world: service robots in the frontline
OpenAlex · 26 September 2018
How do Machine Learning, Robotic Process Automation, and Blockchains Affect the Human Factor in Business Process Management?
OpenAlex · 1 January 2018
Birth of Industry 5.0: Making Sense of Big Data with Artificial Intelligence, “The Internet of Things” and Next-Generation Technology Policy
OpenAlex · 1 January 2018
Consumer Choice and Autonomy in the Age of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data
OpenAlex · 18 December 2017
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (1 November 2019), “Robots in the Workplace: a Threat to—or Opportunity for—Meaningful Work?,” evidence record 8602, https://ethics.ai/record/8602 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.