Understanding and Resolving Failures in Human-Robot Interaction: Literature Review and Model Development
While substantial effort has been invested in making robots more reliable, experience demonstrates that robots operating in unstructured environments are often challenged by frequent failures. Despite this, robots have not yet reached a level of design that allows effective management of faulty or unexpected behavior by untrained users. To understand why this may be the case, an in-depth literature review was done to explore when people perceive and resolve robot failures, how robots communicate
Record details
Published: 15 June 2018
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Agents & autonomy · Environment · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Artificial intelligence, systemic risks, and sustainability
OpenAlex · 17 September 2021
Artificial Intelligence in Education: AIEd for Personalised Learning Pathways
OpenAlex · 9 December 2022
Persistent AI Agents in Academic Research: A Single-Investigator Implementation Case Study
arXiv · 26 May 2026
Voluntary Collusion with Secret Tools in Competing LLM Agents
arXiv · 26 May 2026
Microsoft built an agentic security system with red, blue, and green team AI agents. It enters public preview August 3.
The Next Web AI · 27 July 2026
Artificial intelligence and augmented intelligence collaboration: regaining trust and confidence in the financial sector
OpenAlex · 25 June 2018
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (15 June 2018), “Understanding and Resolving Failures in Human-Robot Interaction: Literature Review and Model Development,” evidence record 8321, https://ethics.ai/record/8321 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.