Smart Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, and Algorithms (STARA): Employees’ perceptions of our future workplace
Abstract Futurists predict that a third of jobs that exist today could be taken by Smart Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, and Algorithms (STARA) by 2025. However, very little is known about how employees perceive these technological advancements in regards to their own jobs and careers, and how they are preparing for these potential changes. A new measure (STARA awareness) was created for this study that captures the extent to which employees feel their job could be replaced by the
Record details
Published: 24 January 2017
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Jobs & economy · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Algorithms for journalism: The future of news work
OpenAlex · 12 January 2017
Healthcare Robotics.
OpenAlex · 1 January 2017
Robots, Jobs, Taxes, and Responsibilities
OpenAlex · 1 March 2017
Consumer Choice and Autonomy in the Age of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data
OpenAlex · 18 December 2017
How do Machine Learning, Robotic Process Automation, and Blockchains Affect the Human Factor in Business Process Management?
OpenAlex · 1 January 2018
Birth of Industry 5.0: Making Sense of Big Data with Artificial Intelligence, “The Internet of Things” and Next-Generation Technology Policy
OpenAlex · 1 January 2018
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (24 January 2017), “Smart Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, and Algorithms (STARA): Employees’ perceptions of our future workplace,” evidence record 8069, https://ethics.ai/record/8069 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.