Distributional Open-Ended Evaluation of LLM Cultural Value Alignment Based on Value Codebook
As LLMs are globally deployed, aligning their cultural value orientations is critical for safety and user engagement. However, existing benchmarks face the Construct-Composition-Context ($C^3$) challenge: relying on discriminative, multiple-choice formats that probe value knowledge rather than true orientations, overlook subcultural heterogeneity, and mismatch with real-world open-ended generation. We introduce DOVE, a distributional evaluation framework that directly compares human-written text
Record details
Published: 16 March 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Safety & alignment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Age Predictors Through the Lens of Generalization, Bias Mitigation, and Interpretability: Reflections on Causal Implications
arXiv · 17 March 2026
Prompt Programming for Cultural Bias and Alignment of Large Language Models
arXiv · 17 March 2026
LLM Constitutional Multi-Agent Governance
arXiv · 13 March 2026
Normative Common Ground Replication (NormCoRe): Replication-by-Translation for Studying Norms in Multi-Agent AI
arXiv · 12 March 2026
Mitigating Translationese Bias in Multilingual LLM-as-a-Judge via Disentangled Information Bottleneck
arXiv · 11 March 2026
BeliefShift: Benchmarking Temporal Belief Consistency and Opinion Drift in LLM Agents
arXiv · 25 March 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (16 March 2026), “Distributional Open-Ended Evaluation of LLM Cultural Value Alignment Based on Value Codebook,” evidence record 7190, https://ethics.ai/record/7190 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.