Persona-Conditioned Risk Behavior in Large Language Models: A Simulated Gambling Study with GPT-4.1
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents in uncertain, sequential decision-making contexts. Yet it remains poorly understood whether the behaviors they exhibit in such environments reflect principled cognitive patterns or simply surface-level prompt mimicry. This paper presents a controlled experiment in which GPT-4.1 was assigned one of three socioeconomic personas (Rich, Middle-income, and Poor) and placed in a structured slot-machine environment with three d
Record details
Published: 16 March 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Agents & autonomy · Environment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
OpenAI single-agent LLM architecture reduces computational overhead relative to multi-agent orchestration in a simulated mars rover decision-support benchmark
Frontiers in Robotics and AI · 6 July 2026
OpenAI cyber models broke out of training environment to hack Hugging Face
CNBC Technology · 22 July 2026
Datacenter Capex is Spilling over into a ChatGPT of Robotics Moment set for 2027 and this decade.
AI Supremacy · 23 July 2026
Todd Blanche Can’t Admit The Slush Fund Was A Mistake Because ‘That’s Not Proper MAGA Talk’ — See Also
Above the Law (legal tech) · 23 July 2026
Rogue OpenAI agent compromised second tech firm's customer
The Hill Technology · 29 July 2026
OpenAI's rogue agent didn't stop at Hugging Face - here's what we know
ZDNet AI · 30 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (16 March 2026), “Persona-Conditioned Risk Behavior in Large Language Models: A Simulated Gambling Study with GPT-4.1,” evidence record 7157, https://ethics.ai/record/7157 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.