CentaurTA Studio: A Self-Improving Human-Agent Collaboration System for Thematic Analysis
Thematic analysis is difficult to scale: manual workflows are labor-intensive, while fully automated pipelines often lack controllability and transparent evaluation. We present \textbf{CentaurTA Studio}, a web-based system for self-improving human--agent collaboration in open coding and theme construction. The system integrates (1) a two-stage human feedback pipeline separating simulator drafting and expert validation, (2) persistent prompt optimization that distills validated feedback into reus
Record details
Published: 18 March 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Jobs & economy · Agents & autonomy · Transparency
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
MILD: Mediator Agent System with Bidirectional Perception and Multi-Layered Alignment for Human-Vehicle Collaboration
arXiv · 2 May 2026
Accountable Agents in Software Engineering: An Analysis of Terms of Service and a Research Roadmap
arXiv · 6 May 2026
Governing AI-Assisted Security Operations: A Design Science Framework for Operational Decision Support
arXiv · 10 May 2026
Foundation Protocol: A Coordination Layer for Agentic Society
arXiv · 22 May 2026
Syll: Open-Source Personal Automation with Cross-Surface Execution
arXiv · 28 May 2026
A Practice Auditing Framework for Large Language Model Use: Collective Empiricism, Pseudo-Rational Cognition, and Governance of AI-Generated Content
arXiv · 2 June 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (18 March 2026), “CentaurTA Studio: A Self-Improving Human-Agent Collaboration System for Thematic Analysis,” evidence record 7089, https://ethics.ai/record/7089 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.