Fine-Tuning Large Language Models for Cooperative Tactical Deconfliction of Small Unmanned Aerial Systems
The growing deployment of small Unmanned Aerial Systems (sUASs) in low-altitude airspaces has increased the need for reliable tactical deconfliction under safety-critical constraints. Tactical deconfliction involves short-horizon decision-making in dense, partially observable, and heterogeneous multi-agent environments, where both cooperative separation assurance and operational efficiency must be maintained. While Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit strong reasoning capabilities, their direct
Record details
Published: 30 March 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Agents & autonomy · Environment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Emergence WebVoyager: Toward Consistent and Transparent Evaluation of (Web) Agents in The Wild
arXiv · 30 March 2026
HeteroHub: An Applicable Data Management Framework for Heterogeneous Multi-Embodied Agent System
arXiv · 30 March 2026
Beyond Message Passing: A Semantic View of Agent Communication Protocols
arXiv · 30 March 2026
RAAP: Retrieval-Augmented Affordance Prediction with Cross-Image Action Alignment
arXiv · 31 March 2026
BotVerse: Real-Time Event-Driven Simulation of Social Agents
arXiv · 31 March 2026
Train the Trainers -- An Agentic AI Framework for Peer-Based Mental Health Support in Battlefield Environments
arXiv · 31 March 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (30 March 2026), “Fine-Tuning Large Language Models for Cooperative Tactical Deconfliction of Small Unmanned Aerial Systems,” evidence record 6589, https://ethics.ai/record/6589 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.