Unveiling the Reasoning Process of Large Language Models
Large language models often reason beyond surface tokens, but the internal stage at which token-level information becomes abstract relational structure remains unclear. We investigate this question by analyzing how attention heads and layers transform information during autoregressive reasoning. Across mathematical and symbolic reasoning tasks, we observe a consistent layer-wise division of labor: outer layers mainly preserve and route input-related features, whereas middle layers reorganize the
Record details
Published: 31 March 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Jobs & economy · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
A Framework for Improvement of Contractor Selection Procedures on Major Construction Project in Libya.
OpenAlex · 11 March 2026
The Security Cost of Intelligence: AI Capability, Cyber Risk, and Deployment Paradox
arXiv · 24 April 2026
Linking Behaviour and Perception to Evaluate Meaningful Human Control over Partially Automated Driving
arXiv · 1 May 2026
Assessing the utility of advanced adoption models for AI-based financial services: insights into automated and hybrid robo-advisors
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · 14 July 2026
Robots and sectoral FDI: Why automation attracts technology-driven but not resource-driven investment in OECD countries
Technology in Society · 14 July 2026
Recursive Harness Self-Improvement
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 16 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (31 March 2026), “Unveiling the Reasoning Process of Large Language Models,” evidence record 6542, https://ethics.ai/record/6542 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.