Aligning Recommendations with User Popularity Preferences
Popularity bias is a pervasive problem in recommender systems, where recommendations disproportionately favor popular items. This not only results in "rich-get-richer" dynamics and a homogenization of visible content, but can also lead to misalignment of recommendations with individual users' preferences for popular or niche content. This work studies popularity bias through the lens of user-recommender alignment. To this end, we introduce Popularity Quantile Calibration, a measurement framework
Record details
Published: 1 April 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Safety & alignment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
On-the-fly Repulsion in the Contextual Space for Rich Diversity in Diffusion Transformers
arXiv · 30 March 2026
Incomplete Multi-View Multi-Label Classification via Shared Codebook and Fused-Teacher Self-Distillation
arXiv · 5 April 2026
SAVe: Self-Supervised Audio-visual Deepfake Detection Exploiting Visual Artifacts and Audio-visual Misalignment
arXiv · 26 March 2026
The Alignment Tax: Response Homogenization in Aligned LLMs and Its Implications for Uncertainty Estimation
arXiv · 25 March 2026
Latent Bias Alignment for High-Fidelity Diffusion Inversion in Real-World Image Reconstruction and Manipulation
arXiv · 25 March 2026
BeliefShift: Benchmarking Temporal Belief Consistency and Opinion Drift in LLM Agents
arXiv · 25 March 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (1 April 2026), “Aligning Recommendations with User Popularity Preferences,” evidence record 6489, https://ethics.ai/record/6489 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.