Themis: An explainable AI-enabled framework for Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback
Training safe Reinforcement Learning (RL) systems is inherently challenging, with no guarantee of avoiding unwanted behaviors. The most effective defenses against this are (i) transparency through explainability and (ii) alignment via human feedback. While both show promising results, no publicly available framework currently combines them. To address this, we introduce Themis, an XAI-enabled testing and evaluation framework for Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback. Themis supports over 20
Record details
Published: 23 June 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment · Transparency
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Phoneme-Level Mispronunciation Screening in Polish-Speaking Children with an Explainable Assistant
arXiv · 23 June 2026
Safety-Aware Evaluation of LLM-Generated Driver Intervention Messages through Multi-Task Risk Fusion
arXiv · 21 June 2026
NebulaExp-8B: An Empirical Post-Training Pipeline via Full-Scale Ablation Research
arXiv · 25 June 2026
Bridging Vision and Language Concepts through Optimal Transport Semantic Flow
arXiv · 25 June 2026
Cohort-Anchored Foundation Models for Electronic Health Records: From Risk Scores to Auditable Peer Cohorts
arXiv · 20 June 2026
Graph-of-Differences: Anatomy-Structured Difference Alignment for Medical Image Re-Identification
arXiv · 19 June 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (23 June 2026), “Themis: An explainable AI-enabled framework for Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback,” evidence record 648, https://ethics.ai/record/648 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.