Novel Memory Forgetting Techniques for Autonomous AI Agents: Balancing Relevance and Efficiency
Long-horizon conversational agents require persistent memory for coherent reasoning, yet uncontrolled accumulation causes temporal decay and false memory propagation. Benchmarks such as LOCOMO and LOCCO report performance degradation from 0.455 to 0.05 across stages, while MultiWOZ shows 78.2% accuracy with 6.8% false memory rate under persistent retention. This work introduces an adaptive budgeted forgetting framework that regulates memory through relevanceguided scoring and bounded optimizatio
Record details
Published: 2 April 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
APEX: Agent Payment Execution with Policy for Autonomous Agent API Access
arXiv · 2 April 2026
Cognitive Comparability and the Limits of Governance: Evaluating Authority Under Radical Capability Asymmetry
arXiv · 3 April 2026
SentinelAgent: Intent-Verified Delegation Chains for Securing Federal Multi-Agent AI Systems
arXiv · 3 April 2026
OrgAgent: Organize Your Multi-Agent System like a Company
arXiv · 1 April 2026
Ontology-Constrained Neural Reasoning in Enterprise Agentic Systems: A Neurosymbolic Architecture for Domain-Grounded AI Agents
arXiv · 1 April 2026
LLM Agents Predict Social Media Reactions but Do Not Outperform Text Classifiers: Benchmarking Simulation Accuracy Using 120K+ Personas of 1511 Humans
arXiv · 31 March 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (2 April 2026), “Novel Memory Forgetting Techniques for Autonomous AI Agents: Balancing Relevance and Efficiency,” evidence record 6440, https://ethics.ai/record/6440 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.