Structural Rigidity and the 57-Token Predictive Window: A Physical Framework for Inference-Layer Governability in Large Language Models
Current AI safety relies on behavioral monitoring and post-training alignment, yet empirical measurement shows these approaches produce no detectable pre-commitment signal in a majority of instruction-tuned models tested. We present an energy-based governance framework connecting transformer inference dynamics to constraint-satisfaction models of neural computation, and apply it to a seven-model cohort across five geometric regimes. Using trajectory tension (rho = ||a|| / ||v||), we identify a 5
Record details
Published: 4 April 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Safety & alignment · Environment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
OceanPile: A Large-Scale Multimodal Ocean Corpus for Foundation Models
arXiv · 25 April 2026
Infra-Bayesian Reinforcement Learning Agents Outperform Classical RL For Worst-Case Robustness
arXiv · 22 May 2026
Intelligence as Managed Autonomy: Failure, Escalation, and Governance for Agentic AI Systems
arXiv · 26 May 2026
Misaligned AI as a New Insider Risk
arXiv · 4 June 2026
Risk-Aware LLM Agents for Geospatial Data Retrieval: Design and Preliminary Adversarial Evaluation
arXiv · 13 June 2026
WasteAssistant: Regulation-Guided Visual Question Answering Framework for Intelligent Waste Segregation and Sustainable Managemen
arXiv · 12 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (4 April 2026), “Structural Rigidity and the 57-Token Predictive Window: A Physical Framework for Inference-Layer Governability in Large Language Models,” evidence record 6373, https://ethics.ai/record/6373 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.