NyayaMind- A Framework for Transparent Legal Reasoning and Judgment Prediction in the Indian Legal System
Court Judgment Prediction and Explanation (CJPE) aims to predict a judicial decision and provide a legally grounded explanation for a given case based on the facts, legal issues, arguments, cited statutes, and relevant precedents. For such systems to be practically useful in judicial or legal research settings, they must not only achieve high predictive performance but also generate transparent and structured legal reasoning that aligns with established judicial practices. In this work, we prese
Record details
Published: 10 April 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Transparency
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
A Proposed Biomedical Data Policy Framework to Reduce Fragmentation, Improve Quality, and Incentivize Sharing in Indian Healthcare in the era of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Health
arXiv · 13 April 2026
Mind the Gap: Pitfalls of LLM Alignment with Asian Public Opinion
arXiv · 6 March 2026
SamaVaani: Auditing and Debiasing Multilingual Clinical ASR for Indian Languages
arXiv · 25 June 2026
Prediction of female reproductive tract infections risk among college-going young adult women in Delhi using explainable artificial intelligence
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · 17 July 2026
NITI Aayog meets Meta, YouTube, industry bodies on online content blocking rules
MediaNama (IN) · 22 July 2026
How India’s Young Faced Down Modi
Time Tech · 29 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (10 April 2026), “NyayaMind- A Framework for Transparent Legal Reasoning and Judgment Prediction in the Indian Legal System,” evidence record 6075, https://ethics.ai/record/6075 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.