Scoring Is Not Enough: Addressing Gaps in Utility-fairness Trade-offs for Ranking
Scoring functions are used to represent the relevance of individual documents. In modern information retrieval or recommendation systems, they are often learned from data and play a pivotal role in ranking sets of documents or items in a way that maximizes utility to a query or user. With the recent interest in algorithmic fairness, the success of scoring has naturally led to methods that learn scores that simultaneously trade off fairness and utility. In this work, we show that in stark contras
Record details
Published: 24 June 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Detect, Unlearn, Restore: Defending Text Summarization Models Against Data Poisoning
arXiv cs.CR (AI security) · 24 June 2026
Retrieval-Warmed Energy-Based Reasoning: A Five-Arm Ablation Methodology for Diffusion-as-Inference on Structured Reasoning Tasks
arXiv · 25 June 2026
Statistical and Structural Approaches to Algorithmic Fairness
arXiv · 24 June 2026
Adaptive Utility driven Resource Orchestration for Resilient AI (AURORA-AI)
arXiv · 25 June 2026
FLUX3D: High-Fidelity 3D Gaussian Generation with Diffusion-Aligned Sparse Representation
arXiv · 23 June 2026
MMed-Bench-IR: A Heterogeneous Benchmark for Multilingual Medical Information Retrieval
arXiv · 23 June 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (24 June 2026), “Scoring Is Not Enough: Addressing Gaps in Utility-fairness Trade-offs for Ranking,” evidence record 597, https://ethics.ai/record/597 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.