Cross-Cultural Simulation of Citizen Emotional Responses to Bureaucratic Red Tape Using LLM Agents
Improving policymaking is a central concern in public administration. Prior human subject studies reveal substantial cross-cultural differences in citizens' emotional responses to red tape during policy implementation. While LLM agents offer opportunities to simulate human-like responses and reduce experimental costs, their ability to generate culturally appropriate emotional responses to red tape remains unverified. To address this gap, we propose an evaluation framework for assessing LLMs' emo
Record details
Published: 14 April 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Evaluating Plan Compliance in Autonomous Programming Agents
arXiv · 13 April 2026
When to Forget: A Memory Governance Primitive
arXiv · 13 April 2026
Evaluating Cooperation in LLM Social Groups through Elected Leadership
arXiv · 13 April 2026
Governance by Design: A Parsonian Institutional Architecture for Internet-Wide Agent Societies
arXiv · 13 April 2026
EmbodiedGovBench: A Benchmark for Governance, Recovery, and Upgrade Safety in Embodied Agent Systems
arXiv · 13 April 2026
Formalizing Kantian Ethics: Formula of the Universal Law Logic (FULL)
arXiv · 15 April 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (14 April 2026), “Cross-Cultural Simulation of Citizen Emotional Responses to Bureaucratic Red Tape Using LLM Agents,” evidence record 5875, https://ethics.ai/record/5875 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.