Reinforcing privacy reasoning in LLMs via normative simulacra from fiction
Information handling practices of LLM agents are broadly misaligned with the contextual privacy expectations of their users. Contextual Integrity (CI) provides a principled framework, defining privacy as the appropriate flow of information within context-relative norms. However, existing approaches either double inference cost via supervisor-assistant architectures, or fine-tune on narrow task-specific data. We propose extracting normative simulacra (structured representations of norms and infor
Record details
Published: 21 April 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment · Privacy · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Frequency-Enhanced Diffusion Models: Curriculum-Guided Semantic Alignment for Zero-Shot Skeleton Action Recognition
arXiv · 10 April 2026
ProtoMedAgent: Multimodal Clinical Interpretability via Privacy-Aware Agentic Workflows
arXiv · 13 May 2026
How Far Will They Go? Red-Teaming Online Influence with Large Language Models
arXiv · 20 May 2026
VisualLeakBench: Auditing the Fragility of Large Vision-Language Models against PII Leakage and Social Engineering
arXiv · 11 March 2026
PrivacyAlign: Contextual Privacy Alignment for LLM Agents
arXiv · 19 June 2026
STAR: Skeletal Token Alignment and Rearrangement for Interaction Recognition
arXiv · 19 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (21 April 2026), “Reinforcing privacy reasoning in LLMs via normative simulacra from fiction,” evidence record 5527, https://ethics.ai/record/5527 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.